The wrong side of rhetoric

Is there such a thing as “the wrong side of history”? We hear this phrase a lot these days. Jonah Goldberg and Prager University take a closer look at what it means and how seriously we should take it:

This entry was posted in Random Musings. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to The wrong side of rhetoric

  1. I have watched this video b4. History doesn’t have sides. History just happens. … unless you want to posit that there IS a god and that god IS directing history. And that god is the final arbiter of right and wrong. THEN, you can be on the wrong side of it.

  2. Fairly right. It’s like the US is playing it’s role as the cavalry that comes in at the last minute.. Again. Like WW2.

    The US government is all sorts of ignorant, sure they agreed to take some of the refugees, but that still leaves all of Europe in looming chaos. No reaction to Russian but sanctions. ISIS, bomb them. Great. This is WW3, in my mind. Might not be now as large scale yet but it will be. We’re just not fighting with sticks and stones but politics and propaganda.

    Greetings from a Nordic country preparing to take in 30,000 more new refugees by the end of the year, and we only have 6 million people to begin with. How are we going to support that this soon?

  3. For some reason I feel like I may have been far too opinionated. I mean no offense.

  4. America is semi-famous for being slow to act. And lately we seem to be showing that even when we do we don’t do it effectively.

Comments are closed.